Archive for the ‘Best Practices’ category

Joint AMI/CA White Paper: Striving to Achieve 100% Data Accuracy

March 25th, 2009

AMI and CA have jointly authored a white paper on developing asset tracking solutions that maximize asset data accuracy.  This White Paper takes you through the process of analyzing, designing and implementing asset tracking technology and process to keep your IT repositories accurate.

AMI/CA Joint White Paper – Striving to Achieve 100% Data Accuracy

As I’ve called out before in this blog, AMI’s reason for being is to enable enterprises to maximize the value of their asset management solutions by maintaining accurate data.  Millions of dollars are spent on IT management solutions, and without accurate data, the reporting and business intelligence coming from these systems is meaningless.  You need a robust and repeatable process for tracking rapidly changing asset information, and this white paper outlines the technology and processes you need to achieve this goal.

Enjoy.

New Version of the AMI Asset Tracking Guide

March 31st, 2008

A new version our Free Asset Tracking Guide is now available for download.  We made a lot of improvements to the document such as adding more processes and beefing out the advanced topics sections to include items like integration with auto-discovery.

To access, fill out a quick contact form here and you’ll get access to the PDF immediately.  :)

Happy Tracking,

Tom

Imagers vs. Lasers Update

March 10th, 2008

A while back I wrote a blog post about barcode scanner types, and would like to follow up with some additional info.

Imagers vs. Lasers

For those of you who don’t know, there are two types of barcode scanners: imagers and lasers.

  • Lasers work by shooting a laser on the barcode and sensing the reflection that comes back.  These have been around forever and work really well for 1 dimensional, standard barcode labels.
  • Imagers work like a camera by basically taking a picture of the barcode and interpreting what is in the picture with software.  These are new and have the benefit of working with 2 dimensional tags like the ones you see on UPS boxes.

I took some heat from people responding to my blog when I said I don’t like imagers.  Well, I still don’t.

Headaches with Imagers

The problem we are seeing is that imagers don’t work well with long 1 dimensional barcodes.  The serial number barcodes on Dell monitors, for example, cannot be read using an imager.  At least not the ones on the Symbol devices we typically sell, even the high-end MC9090G which are about $3K a piece minimum.

This is causing a big problem for some of our customers who use primarily 1 dimensional barcodes.  You get the flexibility of supporting 2D barcodes with imagers, but if you don’t use 2D barcodes, this is of little value.  In exchange for 2D support, you have less performance with 1D barcodes and often can’t even scan the 1D barcodes in your environment.

Frustrating.

Your Priorities Should Guide your Decision

If you have high volume scanning needs and use 1D barcodes, you need a scanner that will read these tags very quickly.  If you have to press the scan trigger and move the device around for five seconds to get the device to read your tag, you will quickly become frustrated and tired after a few scans.  And if you’re performing inventory in a warehouse or receiving dock, this will be very frustrating.  In this scenario, I recommend a laser scanner.

If you require support for 2D barcodes, you have to use imagers.  Laser won’t work with 2D barcodes.  In this case, I would demand an evaluation unit from your hardware vendor before you invest a lot of money.  Test the scanner and make sure it works for your needs before spending a ton of money on hardware.

Auditing your Asset Repository

October 9th, 2007

Regardless of what type of asset tracking system you use, from time to time you should audit your database to ensure its accuracy.  It doesn’t matter how easy or effective your tracking processes are to follow: some assets will always fall through the cracks.  Technicians will grab assets off the dock and install them to close tickets.  Assets will simply be misplaced and never scanned.  Assets will be moved without anyone updating the database.

Unrecorded changes to your asset database will happen and should be expected.  You should therefore establish an audit process to check accuracy and true-up your database on a regular basis so that every location in your environment is visited on a schedule.

Audit Scope and Schedule

I recommend a rolling audit process, where a portion of your asset database is audited on a regular cycle. The cycle and scope of your audits will be based on the size of your organization and staff levels. However, a good starting place is to perform a monthly audit of 1/12th of your asset environment. In other words, slice your environment into twelve pieces, and audit one piece every month and don’t repeat a piece until all pieces are done. This ensures your entire asset environment is audited each year.

I’m over-simplifying here.  You will have to look at the physical layout of your environment and determine an audit schedule that fits you, but you get the idea.

Audit Process

Follow this process to audit each slice of your environment.

Collecting Audit Data

The process of collecting asset information during an audit must be fast and accurate.  Your personnel must be able to enter a room, scan in location information as quickly capture the asset tags or serial numbers of the assets at that location.  You need to be able to do this in a minute or less to minimize interruption to your and users and speed the audit process.  AMI recommends the use of mobile devices with barcode and/or RFID scanners which make it easy to collect asset information used by the audit.

  1. Deploy one or more users with mobile devices to the audit location.

  2. Enter the first room or cube and scan or enter the location data into the mobile device.

  3. If available, enter the user information that is responsible for the assets in that room or cube.  Ideally this can be done by scanning a badge number.

  4. Next, scan each of the asset tag of each asset at that location. Your mobile computer should be smart enough to detect when an unknown asset is scanned and audibly prompt the user to capture model and serial number to ensure “rogue” assets are added to the repository correctly.

  5. Save each “audit batch” to the mobile device database.

  6. Move to the next room or cube and repeat steps 2-4.

Comparing Audit Data

Once the audit data is collected, it must be compared to the repository for accuracy. Your exact reporting tools will depend on what software you have available, but you could simply use Excel or Access to build comparison reports.

The audit report should indicate:

  • Location accuracy percentage
  • User accuracy percentage
  • Cost center accuracy percentage
  • Detailed list of assets with non-matching data

Applying Audit Data

Once the audit reports have been generated and saved, you should apply the collected data to your database to “true-up” the data. Your asset tracking system should provide the means to apply collected audit data after audit reports have been generated.  Save off your reports to maintain a history of your asset tracking system accuracy, and rest confidently that your database will be maintained with a high degree of accuracy by knowing that all of your locations are visited on a regular shce

Barcode Scanner Types – Pros and Cons

September 25th, 2007

When selecting mobile devices for barcode scanning applications, take care to select the correct scanner hardware. Most devices come in multiple scanner configurations, and there are a few things to consider when choosing what type of scanner to purchase.

Scanner Types

Lasers

The traditional barcode scanner type is a laser that scans the barcode label and reflects back to the device. For one dimensional standard barcodes, lasers are my favorite. The upside is they scan at a longer distance and it is easier to target a specific barcode when a bunch of barcodes are stuck together in close proximity. The downside is they don’t support two-dimensional barcodes and cannot read damaged tags.

Imagers

The newer devices are shipping with what are called “Imagers.” These are basically cameras that take a picture of the barcode and analyze the image to “scan” the barcode. The benefit of Imagers is they support one and two dimensional barcodes so they are more flexible. Two dimensional barcodes can store more information in a smaller space. They can also be used to store multiple values within a single scan. Lastly, imagers are able to read somewhat damaged tags using fuzzy logic. This can be handy in certain environments. The downside is the scanning distance is shorter, and it often takes longer for the scanner to read the barcode. It is also difficult to isolate a single barcode when there are many close together. This can be extremely annoying in high-volume environments. You can see examples of two dimensional barcodes on UPS of Fedex packages. They look like boxes with little dots all over.

Positron Imagers

Cheap devices ship with what are called Positron imagers. These are basically one dimensional barcode readers that are imager-based. They are horrible. They don’t scan tags well at all and I highly recommend that you never purchase a device with a Positron imager, unless you are looking for a headache and an expensive paperweight.

Recommendations

If you are using high-quality one dimensional tags only, I recommend going with a laser-based scanner. You will be happier with the performance after scanning a lot of tags.

If you need to support 2D tags, then buy a high-quality Imager-based scanner. Just be certain you are not purchasing a 1D imager like a Positron. Most Motorola mobile devices ships with both configurations of Imagers. Be sure to get the 1D/2D imager version. 

Advanced Shipping Notices

June 14th, 2007

If you are a large IT customer that orders a high volume of hardware and software, receiving assets can be difficult and time consuming.  With hundreds or even thousands of hardware assets arriving at your receiving docks every month, how much time and energy does it take to properly tag and enroll each asset into your asset repository?  Quite a bit, potentially.

One way to reduce this time and increase the accuracy of your asset database is to get your vendors to send electronic Advanced Shipping Notices (ASN) ahead of shipments.  ASN files are generally CSV or XML files that are delivered electronically to you ahead of shipments that contain one record for each asset in the shipment.  These files are formatted in a way that can be imported into your repository using an automated process.

Each asset record in the ASN file should have, at very least, the following information:

  • Serial number
  • Model name and/or number
  • PO number

Additional information like cost, tracking number, warranty or lease end date can also be included in ASN files.

Getting it Working

To get an ASN system up and running, you have to do the following:

  1. Contact your vendor and determine their ability to generate and deliver ASN files
  2. Determine the format of vendor ASN files
  3. Provide delivery information to your vendor (FTP site, Email inbox, etc.)
  4. Set up a process to import ASN files into your repository automatically
  5. Load ASN information into receiving mobile devices ahead of receiving

Most commercially available asset repositories have some way to import data and numerous third-party products are available to help you automate ASN imports.  Developing your own ASN import process is a relatively easy task for internal development teams.

Benefits of Using ASN Files

Saving Time Receiving

If you create asset records in your repository by importing ASN files, then at the receiving dock all you have to do is scan the serial number barcode to update the status of each asset record to “Received.”  You don’t have to capture the model or PO information since that information was sent to you by the ASN.  This reduces the time to receive assets and also the number of errors from selecting the wrong model from the product catalog or scanning the wrong PO number.

Preventing Over-Ordering

If you create asset records as soon as items are shipped by your vendors, you can generate reports showing you assets that are inbound.  This can help prevent over-ordering, since you can see that you have assets already on order that could be used to fulfill your requests.

Measuring Vendor and Employee Performance

By using ASNs, you can also measure the performance of your vendors, shipping companies and receiving personnel.  You can do this by measuring the time it takes for assets to be received after the asset records are imported by ASN files.  If the time delta is significant, you can determine whether the shipping company or the receiving process is slow.  This can help you improve your service levels to your customers by identifying bottlenecks in the procurement process.

Asset Identification and Tagging

May 29th, 2007

One issue that comes up again and again from my customers is how to properly identify and tag assets.  Most people have worked at companies that use asset tags, but I’m seeing more and more companies try to use Dell service tags or serial numbers instead of a new asset tagging scheme.

I thought I should take a moment and explain the pros and cons of asset tagging, and some of the tidbits we’ve learned to ensure you identify and tag assets properly.

Asset Identification

Asset Tags vs. Service Tags/Serial Numbers

As I mentioned above, some companies that have IT hardware from a single vendor like Dell have chosen to use the manufacturer’s service tag or serial number as the asset identifier.  Makes sense because why apply a new tag when the vendor has done that for you already?

I always recommend using asset tags.  Here’s why:

  • Manufacturer tags are only guaranteed to be unique for assets from that one vendor.  As soon as you try to enroll assets from other manufacturers into your asset repository, you have the potential for a tag conflict.  Unlikely, but possible.
  • Tag placement is extremely important.  Have you ever tried to scan a Dell service tag on a laptop that is in a docking station?  You can’t.  You have to undock the laptop which disturbs your end user and makes collecting tags during an inventory or audit very time consuming.  With asset tags, you can ensure tags are accessible on all installed or stored devices.

Asset Identification Recommendations

Use MOD137-Compliant Tag Values

By using your own tags, you can implement MOD137 numbering schemes, which we whole-heartedly recommend.  By using MOD137-compliant tags, your scanners and forms can automatically detect errors in data entry, such as when keying in an asset tag with a keyboard, or when reading an asset tag over the phone to your IT desk.  This also enables your barcode scanners to automatically know that you scanned the correct barcode for an asset, vs. accidentally scanning the product code or serial number.

Use Pre-Printed High-Quality, Durable Tags

Use a polyester or vinyl tag material with aggressive adhesive to ensure the longest life of the tag and to prevent users from removing them.  Have the tags printed by a printing company vs. using your own barcode printer.  The amount of money you spend on the service will pay for itself by ensuring tag quality and uniqueness vs. messing around with your own label printer and software.

Use Meaningless Unique Values for Asset Tags

Make sure you do not put any meaningful information within a tag value.  For example, I’ve seen customers use asset tag value that include the building ID where the asset is installed.  I’ve seen others where they concatenated the user id and the location id of the asset.  That’s great and all, but what happens when the asset moves?  You have to reapply the tag which blows away your asset history and is a tremendous pain to your techs.

So, don’t put meaningful information in tag values . . . ever.

Asset Tag Placement

When affixing tags to hardware assets, place them in accessible locations so that techs can scan the barcodes when the equipment is installed or stored.  For all asset types, consider the installed position of the asset and ensure that the tag is easily accessible by the handheld barcode scanner when the equipment is in use. For example, ensure tags on laptops can be scanned when the laptop is connected to a docking station underneath a monitor. Your particular tag placements will vary based on your asset types and installed configurations.

For Desktops and Laptops, I recommend placing the tags at the top front of the chassis and laptop lid respectively per the illustrations below:

DesktopsLaptops

Barcodes vs. RFID

May 22nd, 2007

Everyone’s asking me about RFID for asset tracking these days, specifically whether it’s better than using barcodes. I understand why. The ROI promise of RFID is very compelling. Theoretically RFID promises that you can know where everything is without any manual effort, so why would you spend money on a barcode-based system that requires users to run around scanning stuff.

There are a few things to consider:

  • Is RFID ready for tracking IT assets?
  • What’s the cost?
  • What are the limitations?

This article will tell you what I’ve found as I’ve worked with various RFID vendors and enterprise customers on asset tracking solutions. The bottom line is there are some things you need to know before you can get ROI out of RFID. RFID will make sense in certain applications, but in others it will never make sense.

Hopefully I will demystify some of it for you by pointing out some pretty obvious questions to ask.

How Does RFID Work?

Here’s a quick primer on how RFID works. It’s not rocket science even though it seems like magic. Truth is you’ve been exposed to RFID a lot and haven’t realized it, such as in EZ-Pass tollbooths on the east coast, or your friendly neighborhood Banana Republic doorway.

Tags

Every asset in your environment that you wish to track has to have its own RFID tag. This tag stores the ID for the asset (and possibly additional information but we’ll get to that in a later post) and it emits that ID value as a radio frequency which can be detected by an RFID reader.

There are two types of RFID tags: Active and Passive.

Active Tags

Active tags are self powered and emit a signal over a much wider area. These tags are bulkier and also much more expensive. Anywhere from a few bucks up to $70 per tag. The upside is these tags can be read from a long distance, and are therefore the right choice for high-value assets like your Lincoln Navigator or Nuclear Warhead. ; Active tags can also be read by your favorite mobile device hardware, which is great for performing a warehouse inventory or sweep of your IT installed user environement.

Passive Tags

Passive tags are not self-powered, and therefore require an activator. These tags are much less expensive (people are claiming to have found .10c tags at high volume though I haven’t seen that yet). These tags also have a much smaller read range, though that is improving.

Mobile readers won’t work with Passive Tags because there is not enough power in a mobile device to activate the tag. There are “Mobile” readers that attach to forklifts, but that’s not the kind of mobile reader I’m talking about here.

Readers

So what kind of readers are available? There are two: Fixed and Mobile.

Fixed Readers

Fixed readers are for your doorways, such as entry/exit points in your enterprise or warehouses. Fixed readers come with an Activator and Antenna. The Activator excites the RFID tag so that it emits its signal. The Antenna then reads that signal and sends it upstream over your network to your interested RFID middleware.

Fixed readers cost around $5. There are slightly cheaper models and much more expensvie models like readers embedded in pavement, etc., but figure about $5K per location for fixed RFID reader hardware.

Mobile Readers

Motorola/Symbol, Intermec and other mobile device manufacturers make RFID mobile readers. They don’t do “Active” tags.

Does RFID Work for IT Assets?

No RFID system is going to be able to read all RFID tags on common IT equipment like laptops and desktops in every location in your environment. There are many physical factors to consider with how effective reads will be with your particular assets. For IT equipment, it’s all about metal.

Laptops

If you stick an RFID tag on a laptop with a metal case, there must be a .25 inch space between the RFID chip and the metal case. Tag manufacturers create tags with foam backings to create this space, but think about it. Are your end users going to be okay with a .25 inch padded tag stuck on the top of their laptop? Um, no. They’re going to rip it off as soon as they can. Else the tag will get ripped off as they slide the machine in and out of their laptop bag.

Also, when storing laptops in a warehouse, how do you store them? In a stack, right? That will be interesting with a .25inch padded tag on each laptop. And since you store your laptops in a stack, the metal from the other laptops will cause the same problem with the reads that the padding was supposed to protect.

Warehouses

When you’re picking assets from the warehouse, how do you select and assign a particular asset to a user? With an RFID reader, you’re going to pick up all the assets in range. But what if I want to select just this one? This is an issue where barcoding makes much more sense, since with line-of-sight scanning you can easily target a single device. And with barcodes you can use scan sheets to select users, locations or other values from your database without manual data entry.

On the other hand, if you wanted to quickly count which assets are in your warehouse, a quick scan using an RFID system would do that much more quickly. But with the limitations I described about stacked laptops and mobile readers failing to read passive tags, the technology just isn’t there yet.

Bottom Line

RFID isn’t ready for tracking IT assets. It will be in the next five years, though.  Here’s some tips for you in the meantime.

Use Smart Tags

At that time companies will want to use a hybrid solution called “Smart Tags” that have both a barcoded IDs and RFID chips embedded and synchronized with the same data. In this scenario, you can use both barcode readers for targeted, focused scanning as well as RFID for wide-net audits or automatic detection of movement throughout your enterprise.

Understand the Price

Today, figure $1MM to implement a full RFID tracking system in a single major building in your enterprise. This will get all your entry and exit points covered with fixed readers, RFID tags on all your gear and the professional services required to get all the technology connected to your network and backend systems.