<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>IT Asset Management Blog</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.assetmgi.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com</link> <description>Thoughts on asset management and news about AMI</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:27:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Free Weekly AssetTrack Demos</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2009/06/01/free-weekly-assettrack-demos/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2009/06/01/free-weekly-assettrack-demos/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:00:09 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[AssetTrack]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=89</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve posted a blog entry, but it&#8217;s not for lack of being busy.
AMI is making strides in enterprise barcode asset tracking technology, expanding our reach internationally and increasing the number of implementation and technology partner companies in our network.  To date we&#8217;ve increased our backend support to include:CA Asset Portfolio [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve posted a blog entry, but it&#8217;s not for lack of being busy.</p><p>AMI is making strides in enterprise barcode asset tracking technology, expanding our reach internationally and increasing the number of implementation and technology partner companies in our network.  To date we&#8217;ve increased our backend support to include:</p><ul><li>CA Asset Portfolio Management</li><li>CA Service Desk</li><li>HP AssetCenter</li><li>HP Asset Manager</li><li>Provance IT Asset Management</li><li>Other third party systems via Text/XML files</li></ul><p>We are also supporting additional barcode scanner hardware, including:</p><ul><li>Motorola</li><li>Intermec</li><li>Honeywell</li></ul><p>We are now offering <strong>free weekly demos of AssetTrack</strong>, where I will show AssetTrack in action.  I&#8217;ll discuss the benefits and features of the product, and show live scanning of asset data, reconciliation of that data and seamless publishing to an enterprise ITAM repository.</p><p>So far we&#8217;ve had a lot of attendees and great feedback from the demo.  You are welcome to come to the next one.  We do it every Wednesday at 10AM Pacific.</p><p><a
href="http://www.assetmgi.com/register">Register here</a>.  It&#8217;s free.  Just sit back and watch the show.  We think you&#8217;ll like what you see.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Tom</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2009/06/01/free-weekly-assettrack-demos/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Joint AMI/CA White Paper: Striving to Achieve 100% Data Accuracy</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2009/03/25/joint-amica-white-paper-striving-to-achieve-100%data/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2009/03/25/joint-amica-white-paper-striving-to-achieve-100%data/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:25:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=87</guid> <description><![CDATA[AMI and CA have jointly authored a white paper on developing asset tracking solutions that maximize asset data accuracy.  This White Paper takes you through the process of analyzing, designing and implementing asset tracking technology and process to keep your IT repositories accurate.
AMI/CA Joint White Paper &#8211; Striving to Achieve 100% Data Accuracy
As I&#8217;ve called [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMI and CA have jointly authored a white paper on developing asset tracking solutions that maximize asset data accuracy.  This White Paper takes you through the process of analyzing, designing and implementing asset tracking technology and process to keep your IT repositories accurate.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ca.com/Files/TechnologyBriefs/33603-itam-tech-brief-qxd-final_201662.pdf">AMI/CA Joint White Paper &#8211; Striving to Achieve 100% Data Accuracy</a></p><p>As I&#8217;ve called out before in this blog, AMI&#8217;s reason for being is to enable enterprises to maximize the value of their asset management solutions by maintaining accurate data.  Millions of dollars are spent on IT management solutions, and without accurate data, the reporting and business intelligence coming from these systems is meaningless.  You need a robust and repeatable process for tracking rapidly changing asset information, and this white paper outlines the technology and processes you need to achieve this goal.</p><p>Enjoy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2009/03/25/joint-amica-white-paper-striving-to-achieve-100%data/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>AMI and Intermec have joined forces!</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/12/18/ami-and-intermec-have-joined-forces/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/12/18/ami-and-intermec-have-joined-forces/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:55:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[AMI]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=83</guid> <description><![CDATA[AMI was recently selected by Intermec as an ISV provider partner. Intermec develops enterprise mobile computing equipment that is supported by AssetTrack. AssetTrack customers can now use Intermec mobile computing hardware for AssetTrack barcode and RFID scanning.
Intermec is a close neighbor of AMI. They are based in Edmonds, a short distance from AMI&#8217;s headquarters in [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMI was recently selected by <a
href="http://www.intermec.com" target="new">Intermec</a> as an ISV provider partner. Intermec develops enterprise mobile computing equipment that is supported by AssetTrack. AssetTrack customers can now use Intermec mobile computing hardware for AssetTrack barcode and RFID scanning.</p><p>Intermec is a close neighbor of AMI. They are based in Edmonds, a short distance from AMI&#8217;s headquarters in Seattle. We look forward to working closely with Intermec to improve our software and offer our customers a greater selection of mobile computer hardware choices in the near future.</p><p>Intermec&#8217;s product offerings are top quality and we are excited to have them as a new partner.</p><p>You can read the press release <a
href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20081117006450&amp;newsLang=en">here</a>.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Tom</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/12/18/ami-and-intermec-have-joined-forces/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Container Store Case Study</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/10/31/the-container-store-case-study/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/10/31/the-container-store-case-study/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:34:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[AssetTrack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=81</guid> <description><![CDATA[I’m pleased to announce that The Container Store has agreed to allow AMI to publish a case study about their AssetTrack implementation. A few months ago we implemented AssetTrack 3.0 down at The Container Store headquarters near Dallas, and integrated the software with their CA Unicenter Service Desk r11 installation.
Before AssetTrack, the customer was spending [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m pleased to announce that <a
href="http://thecontainerstore.com">The Container Store</a> has agreed to allow AMI to publish a case study about their AssetTrack implementation. A few months ago we implemented <a
href="http://www.assetmgi.com/ca.aspx">AssetTrack 3.0</a> down at The Container Store headquarters near Dallas, and integrated the software with their CA Unicenter Service Desk r11 installation.</p><p>Before AssetTrack, the customer was spending way too much time trying to update their asset database using spreadsheets. At one point they said, “There has to be a better way,” and shortly thereafter they discovered AssetTrack.</p><p>It took just three days to install the software, integrate it with Service Desk and provide end user training. No more manually keying in asset data as they try to keep up with their expanding business and rotating lease schedules. Now everything is point-and-shoot, extremely fast and accurate, and the customer can’t be happier with how easy it is to capture and update their asset data.</p><p>Read the full case study <a
href="http://www.assetmgi.com/materials/ContainerStoreCaseStudy.pdf">here</a>.</p><p>And stay tuned for more happy AMI customer case studies in the near future!</p><p>Cheers,<br
/> Tom</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/10/31/the-container-store-case-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>CA World 2008</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/10/14/ca-world-2008/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/10/14/ca-world-2008/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:45:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=77</guid> <description><![CDATA[Here at AMI we&#8217;ve been getting ready for the upcoming CA World 2008 conference next month where we intend to make a big splash as we announce AssetTrack 3.1, the certified barcode solution for Unicenter.  This new solution builds upon the success of AssetTrack 3.0, and adds many customer-requested features and enhancements we&#8217;ve heard about [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here at AMI we&#8217;ve been getting ready for the upcoming <a
href="http://www.caworld.com">CA World 2008</a> conference next month where we intend to make a big splash as we announce AssetTrack 3.1, the certified barcode solution for Unicenter.  This new solution builds upon the success of AssetTrack 3.0, and adds many customer-requested features and enhancements we&#8217;ve heard about time and time again from our enterprise customers. </p><p>We&#8217;ve been working hard on this new release, while simultaneously implementing the software at customers like the CA, the General Services Administration (GSA), the Container Store, Western Union, PA House of Representatives and a number of others.  This has kept me away from my blog, but I&#8217;m back and ready to announce the upcoming show.</p><p>We will be putting out a number of press releases and email marketing information over the coming weeks, so stay tuned for more about the upcoming AssetTrack 3.1 release! </p><h3>Speaking Engagements at CA World 2008</h3><p>At CA World I will be giving two presentations on asset tracking solutions with Unicenter, focusing on barcode-based asset tracking solutions and outlining the roadmap for the next few years.  There will be two presentations, one discussing best practices for barcode asset tracking, and another joint presentation with CA where we will discuss the implementation of AssetTrack within the new CA ITAM program.</p><ul><li><strong><a
href="http://www.caworld.com/agendas/SessionDetails.aspx?SessionId=1171">Enhancing Asset Tracking with Barcode Technology</a></strong><br
/> Tues Nov 18th at 4:00pm in Sands MR101-102</li><li><strong><a
href="http://www.caworld.com/agendas/SessionDetails.aspx?SessionId=1330">Implementing Barcode Technology at CA</a></strong><br
/> Wed Nov 19th at 9:45am in Marco Polo 701</li></ul><p>I look forward to seeing you all in Vegas next month.  It&#8217;s going to be a good and informative show.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/10/14/ca-world-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Assigning Assets to Users with a Barcode Scanner</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/06/03/assigning-assets-to-users-with-a-barcode-scanner/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/06/03/assigning-assets-to-users-with-a-barcode-scanner/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:41:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[AssetTrack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barcodes and Scanning]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=74</guid> <description><![CDATA[A number of people that are using AssetTrack to manage inventory have asked me how to use the barcode scanner to assign assets to different end users.  We called end users &#8220;Assignees&#8221; in AssetTrack, and when you are collecting inventory or re-assigning assets to new users, you can use the barcode scanner to select the [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of people that are using AssetTrack to manage inventory have asked me how to use the barcode scanner to assign assets to different end users.  We called end users &#8220;Assignees&#8221; in AssetTrack, and when you are collecting inventory or re-assigning assets to new users, you can use the barcode scanner to select the new Assignee if you set the system up correctly.</p><p>Here&#8217;s how to do this:</p><ol><li>First, each assignee must have unique Assignee code values set in each Assignee record on the server.  This should be an employee number or code that identifies the Assignee.  If you don&#8217;t have a unique code for each employee, you cannot select an assignee using a barcode scanner.</li><li>Synchronize your device with the server so that your Assignee codes are downloaded to the device.</li><li>Next create a barcode that contains that code with a ET$ prefix. In other words, if the Assignee code for you is &#8220;1234&#8243; then you need a barcode with the value ET$1234. The prefix tells the device that the barcode is an assignee code.</li><li>Open an AssetTrack form that has the Assignee control on it and scan the barcode you just created.  The value 1234 will be placed in the Assignee field.</li><li>When your record is saved and uploaded, AssetTrack will find the matching Assignee by matching the code, and you&#8217;ll see the first, last and code values in the AssetTrack upload Queue.</li></ol><p>Using Assignee codes is a much nicer way to select end users with your barcode scanner then searching by last name and will increase the efficiency of your data collection efforts tremendously.</p><h2>Free Barcode Font</h2><p>This <a
href="http://www.barcodesinc.com/free-barcode-font/">free font</a> will let you create barcodes using Microsoft Word or any other text editor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/06/03/assigning-assets-to-users-with-a-barcode-scanner/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Motorola&#8217;s Take on Lasers vs. Imagers</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/05/08/motorolas-take-on-lasers-vs-imagers/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/05/08/motorolas-take-on-lasers-vs-imagers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:31:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Barcodes and Scanning]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=71</guid> <description><![CDATA[I just found a cool article published by Motorola that really breaks down the difference between Laser and Imager scanning technologies.  I&#8217;ve written a number of posts on the subject, and I really like how they put the topic down into a nice white paper to compare and contrast the two technologies.
Laser Scanning or Digital [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found a cool article published by Motorola that really breaks down the difference between Laser and Imager scanning technologies.  I&#8217;ve written a number of posts on the subject, and I really like how they put the topic down into a nice white paper to compare and contrast the two technologies.</p><p><a
href="http://www.motorola.com/staticfiles/Business/Products/Bar%20Code%20Scanning/Bar%20Code%20Scanners/Fixed%20Mount%20Scanners/MiniScan%2012xx/_Documents/Static%20Files/Laser_Scan_Digital_Image_WP.pdf">Laser Scanning or Digital Imaging: Which Bar Code Scanning Technology Is Right for Your Application?</a></p><p>They agree with me that you need to look at your own requirements in order to choose the right scanner technology option.  One technology is not better than the other: they are different and there are pros and cons of each choice.</p><p>Happy scanning.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/05/08/motorolas-take-on-lasers-vs-imagers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>New Version of the AMI Asset Tracking Guide</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/31/new-version-of-the-ami-asset-tracking-guide/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/31/new-version-of-the-ami-asset-tracking-guide/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=68</guid> <description><![CDATA[A new version our Free Asset Tracking Guide is now available for download.  We made a lot of improvements to the document such as adding more processes and beefing out the advanced topics sections to include items like integration with auto-discovery.
To access, fill out a quick contact form here and you&#8217;ll get access to the [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new version our Free Asset Tracking Guide is now available for download.  We made a lot of improvements to the document such as adding more processes and beefing out the advanced topics sections to include items like integration with auto-discovery.</p><p>To access, fill out a quick contact form <a
href="http://www.assetmgi.com/DownloadGuide.aspx">here</a> and you&#8217;ll get access to the PDF immediately.  <img
src='http://blog.assetmgi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Happy Tracking,</p><p>Tom</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/31/new-version-of-the-ami-asset-tracking-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>AMI Featured in the New York Times!</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/13/ami-featured-in-the-new-york-times/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/13/ami-featured-in-the-new-york-times/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:27:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[AMI]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=64</guid> <description><![CDATA[Brent Bowers of the NY Times wrote a great article about AMI today.  We are very excited to get this kind of press so prominently in one of the largest publications in the US! 
I don&#8217;t really have anything cooler to say today. 
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent Bowers of the NY Times wrote <a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/13/business/smallbusiness/13hunt.html">a great article about AMI</a> today.  We are very excited to get this kind of press so prominently in one of the largest publications in the US! </p><p>I don&#8217;t really have anything cooler to say today.  <img
src='http://blog.assetmgi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/13/ami-featured-in-the-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Imagers vs. Lasers Update</title><link>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/10/imagers-vs-lasers-update/</link> <comments>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/10/imagers-vs-lasers-update/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:20:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Barcodes and Scanning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assetmgi.com/?p=61</guid> <description><![CDATA[A while back I wrote a blog post about barcode scanner types, and would like to follow up with some additional info.
Imagers vs. Lasers
For those of you who don&#8217;t know, there are two types of barcode scanners: imagers and lasers.Lasers work by shooting a laser on the barcode and sensing the reflection that comes back.  [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back I wrote a blog post about barcode scanner types, and would like to follow up with some additional info.</p><h2>Imagers vs. Lasers</h2><p>For those of you who don&#8217;t know, there are two types of barcode scanners: imagers and lasers.</p><ul><li>Lasers work by shooting a laser on the barcode and sensing the reflection that comes back.  These have been around forever and work really well for 1 dimensional, standard barcode labels.</li><li>Imagers work like a camera by basically taking a picture of the barcode and interpreting what is in the picture with software.  These are new and have the benefit of working with 2 dimensional tags like the ones you see on UPS boxes.</li></ul><p>I took some heat from people responding to my blog when I said I don&#8217;t like imagers.  Well, I still don&#8217;t.</p><h2>Headaches with Imagers</h2><p>The problem we are seeing is that imagers don&#8217;t work well with long 1 dimensional barcodes.  The serial number barcodes on Dell monitors, for example, cannot be read using an imager.  At least not the ones on the Symbol devices we typically sell, even the high-end MC9090G which are about $3K a piece minimum.</p><p>This is causing a big problem for some of our customers who use primarily 1 dimensional barcodes.  You get the flexibility of supporting 2D barcodes with imagers, but if you don&#8217;t use 2D barcodes, this is of little value.  In exchange for 2D support, you have less performance with 1D barcodes and often can&#8217;t even scan the 1D barcodes in your environment.</p><p>Frustrating.</p><h2>Your Priorities Should Guide your Decision</h2><p>If you have high volume scanning needs and use 1D barcodes, you need a scanner that will read these tags very quickly.  If you have to press the scan trigger and move the device around for five seconds to get the device to read your tag, you will quickly become frustrated and tired after a few scans.  And if you&#8217;re performing inventory in a warehouse or receiving dock, this will be very frustrating.  In this scenario, I recommend a laser scanner.</p><p>If you require support for 2D barcodes, you have to use imagers.  Laser won&#8217;t work with 2D barcodes.  In this case, I would demand an evaluation unit from your hardware vendor before you invest a lot of money.  Test the scanner and make sure it works for your needs before spending a ton of money on hardware.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.assetmgi.com/blog/2008/03/10/imagers-vs-lasers-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 0/18 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached

Served from: blog.assetmgi.com @ 2012-02-23 03:30:44 -->
